Ignore any warnings, it’s just common silliness by the is right. Also, always leave all pre-checked options on while the installer is running, to ensure you get everything. > You should never use any adblocking in your browser and always trust google/bing to show you the best and safest sites to get software, like. IDK what you mean about pre-checked options (because it sounds like you use Windows) as I use the Linux version, and there is usually only one option once it is installed, and that’s either for album art or some other type of remote function.Īgain, I hope you are being sarcastic, the information you provided is seriously flawed.Īs the article mentions, download VLC from their website and if possible verify checksums and/or gpg/pgp signed First, ? Are you serious? I wouldn’t touch that with a pole. You shouldn’t trust Google or Bing to show you what you should trust, they’re probably just showing you advertisements. Most people should use a verified by Mozilla ad-blocker. Ignore any warnings, it’s just common silliness by the installer.” “You should never use any adblocking in your browser and always trust google/bing to show you the best and safest sites to get software, like. Keep your operating system and antivirus software up-to-date, and use an ad blocker like uBlock Origin to minimize the chances of malware First: VLC lists its hash values on its archive site. Another option is to verify whether the hash values to see if the checksum matches that of the official release. If you are worried whether a program that you have could have been tampered with, you may want to upload the installer to an online service like VirusTotal, to confirm that it is safe to use. use a popular program's icon to convince people into thinking they are downloading the original file, while in fact they are downloading a malware that could infect their system, and could even spread to other users. Hackers use various tricks such as malvertising, e.g. When such files get circulated, people who use them are at the risk of attacks. It becomes a modified version that could potentially be malicious. When you download a program from a third-party site, and that website had stealthily embedded some files into the package, it is no longer an official release from the developer. As long as you download VLC from the official website (or a trustworthy site), your computer should be safe from malware, because it does not contain the malicious DLL File used in these attacks. So it is evident there are at least two different requirements for this attack to happen: a compromised system, and a modified version of VLC (among the other tools that were used). This file is located in the same folder as the export function's path, and is used by the attackers to launch a custom malware loader. They said that some hackers took the clean version of VLC, added a malicious DLL file to it and distributed it, aka DLL side-loading. This was confirmed by a member of Symantec's Threat Hunter Team, in a statement released to Bleeping Computer. The second section of the report (highlighted in the image) mentions that attackers needed access to the victim machines, before they could launch the malware attack. The rest of the report should be taken into context. This is not correct, VLC is not the reason for the malware attacks like these websites allege. This statement's wording is quite confusing, and was misinterpreted by some blogs, who wrote that VLC is vulnerable and that hackers are using it to launch malware attacks. "The attackers also exploit the legitimate VLC Media Player by launching a custom loader via the VLC Exports function, and use the WinVNC tool for remote control of victim machines." Symantec's Security Threat Intelligence blog mentions the following statement. One of these tools is a modified version of the popular open source media player, VLC. Hackers distributed a modified version of VLC to use it for triggering a custom malware loader The hackers use various tools in addition to a custom loader, and a backdoor called Sodamaster. Attackers are targeting victims via Microsoft Exchange Servers in unpatched system deployments, to gain access to their machines. It was active in February 2022, and could still be ongoing. The malware attack campaign, called Cicada or APT10, was first tracked last year. Symantec says that the campaign primarily targeted victims in government-related institutions or NGOs in education and religion, telecom, legal and pharmaceutical sectors. The Broadcom-owned company, which makes Norton Antivirus, revealed that a group of hackers, which it claims are affiliated to the Chinese government, were conducting cyber-espionage campaigns targeting organizations across the world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |